I went to London on New Year's Eve 2008.
It wasn't my first trip to the city but strangely enough I couldn't remember the previous ones. Though I had a really good time there, a feeling of profound unease unsettled me from the very start.
Upon my return to Paris, I started reflecting on it. London is in many ways radically different from Paris. The word “easy” comes to mind. You'll meet mostly foreigners, working in bars, hotels, restaurants, theaters and so on, with whom you'll exchange basic information in a rough stuttering English. Life is concentrated in one small area: one street is home to all the clothes and fashion shops you'll find in any other European capital, another to bars, clubs, theaters and fast food chains. And that's about all you'll experience. Small town meets Broadway.
I stumbled on Rem Koolhaas' article: The Generic city shortly afterwards and was surprised to find it expressing some of the feelings I had experienced in London.
Let's ignore for a moment Koolhaas' sententious tone and take a closer look at his depiction of the generic city, which I find quite interesting – though not really revolutionary.
(Skyscraper in Hamburg)
"Supremely inorganic, the organic is the Generic City's strongest myth"
Chut
Je peux m'exprîmer en français, si vous préférez. J'ai trouvé un article qui décrit un des oeuvres de Rem Koolhaas à Seattle aux Etats-Unis::::
RépondreSupprimerSeattle Central Library: Creating the perfect public space
Je suis Canadien, et j'ai voyagé beaucoup dans des autres pays, qui me donne une perspective ouverte aux solutions des citoyens destinés à travailler et vivre dans un espace compact, comme se trouve dans une grande ville. Je pense que Koolhaas a trouvé une bonne solution ici, à la bibliothèque centrale de Seattle, même si des critiques ont dit qu'il a isolé l'accès du trottoir hors du bâtiment. J'aime très bien ce qu'il a créé ici.
Vous pouvez aussi remarquer que l'article au-dessus été écrit à Londres!
+ 1 (plus one)
RépondreSupprimer